| Table B1 Methods and
models which should be used for design of typical column-stabilised
units |
| | Two-pontoon semisubmersible | Ring-pontoon semisubmersible |
| Hydrodynamic model, Morison | Global structural strength
model | Fatigue method | Hydrodynamic model, Morison | Global structural strength
model | Fatigue method |
| Harsh environment, restricted
areas or world wide | X | 1 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 7 |
| Y | 1 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 7 |
| Benign areas | X | 2 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 7 |
| Y | 1 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 7 |
Definitions
X-unit
following normal class survey intervals (survey in sheltered waters
or drydock every 4 to 5 years).
Y-unit
located for a longer period on location - surveys carried
out in-water at location.
Hydrodynamic models1) Hybrid
model - Sink-source and/or Morison (when relevant, for
calculation of drag forces).2) Morison model with contingency factor
1.3 for strength and 1.1 for fatigue. Global structural models3) Beam model. 4) Combined beam and shell model. The
extent of the beam and shell models may vary depending on the design.
For typical beam structures a beam model alone may be acceptable.5) Complete shell model. Fatigue method6) Simplified
fatigue analysis.7) Stochastic fatigue analysis, based
on a screening process with simplified approach to identify critical
details. Harsh environment, restricted areas or world
wide¾ Units (X) designed for operation based
on world wide requirements given in DNV-RP-C205. ¾ Units (Y) designed for operation
based on site specific requirements. Benign waters¾
Units (X) designed for operation based on site specific criteria
for benign waters.¾ Units (Y) designed for operation
based on site specific criteria for benign waters. |