The electronic pdf versions of the documents found through http://www.dnv.com/ are the officially binding versions. Copyright Det Norske Veritas.

[Book] [Expand] [Collapse] [Search Forms] [Previous Section with Hits] [Next Section with Hits] [Clear Search] [Help]

Expand Search


C: Fibre failure [Table of Contents] E: Delamination

DNV-OS-C501 Composite Components

[-] Sec.6: Failure Mechanisms & Design Criteria
[-] D: Matrix cracking

Sec.6
D. Matrix cracking

Sec.6
D 100   General

Sec.6 D
101
   Matrix design criteria apply to a matrix in a ply where the deformation of the matrix is restrained by the fibres of the ply or the surrounding laminate.

Sec.6 D
102
   Matrix cracking is defined here as the onset of matrix cracking. The increase of the number of matrix cracks at higher stresses or strains is not covered by the matrix cracking criteria presented in this section.

Sec.6 D
103
   Characteristic strength shall be defined according to section 4 A600.

Sec.6 D
104
   Matrix cracking shall be checked on the ply level.

Sec.6 D
105
   Two alternative design criteria may be used. The simple stress criterion (D200) or the Puck criterion (D300).

Sec.6 D
106
   If the component may fail due to wedge shaped matrix cracks in compression, the Puck criterion must be used to obtain the direction of the failure surface(D300 and D400).

Sec.6
D 200   Matrix failure based on simple stress criterion

Sec.6 D
201
   The following design criterion should be used when the stress in one direction is dominating compared to the stresses in the other directions. The stress in one direction is said to be dominating when the criterion in 202 is not satisfied.

raster

where,
ndirection of the dominating stress
snkcharacteristic value of the local load effect of the structure (stress) in the direction n
raster characteristic value of the stress components to matrix cracking in direction n
gFpartial load effect factor
gSdpartial load-model factor
gMpartial resistance factor
gRdpartial resistance-model factor, gRd = 1.0

The co-ordinate system is the ply co-ordinate system.



Sec.6 D
202
   The combination between the stress components in several directions shall be taken into consideration when the criterion below is satisfied. In that case, there is no dominating stress and the combination cannot be disregarded.

maxi

raster

The co-ordinate system is the ply co-ordinate system, where i and n refer to the directions 22, 33, 12, 13 and 23.

Sec.6 D
203
   When the combination between the stress components in several directions shall be taken into consideration, the design criterion for matrix cracking is given by:

raster

where,
nthe co-ordinate system is the ply co-ordinate system, where n refers to the directions 22, 33, 12, 13 and 23
snkcharacteristic value of the local load effect of the structure (stress) in the direction n
raster characteristic value of the stress components to matrix cracking in direction n
gFpartial load effect factor
gSd,partial load-model factor
gMpartial resistance factor
gRdpartial resistance-model factor, gRd = 1.15.



Sec.6 D
204
   The characteristic strength raster for each of the stress components snk and the corresponding coefficients of variation COVn are defined as specified in section 4 A600.

Sec.6 D
205
   The combined COVcomb of the characteristic strength

  raster is defined according to one of the following alternatives. The second alternative is conservative with respect to the first.

raster

or

COVcomb = maxn (COVn )

where:
nthe co-ordinate system is the ply co-ordinate system, where n refers to the directions 22, 33, 12, 13 and 23
COVn COV for stress component n
COVcombCOV for the combined stress components.


Sec.6 D
206
   When two or more loads are combined, each stress component snk in direction n can be the result of several combined loads. In that case each stress component snkj, which is the local load effect of the structure in direction n due to load j, shall be considered separately as an individual stress component to determine the COV.

raster

or

COVcomb. = maxn (COVn )



Sec.6 D
207
   The choice of the partial safety factors shall be based on the most conservative partial safety factors obtained when treating each stress component snkj , which is the local load effect of the structure in direction n due to load j, as a single load.

Sec.6 D
208
   The partial safety factors gF and gM shall be chosen as described in section 8 with COVs equal to COVcomb, as described in 205 and 206.

Sec.6 D
209
   Matrix failure cannot be checked on a laminate level, it shall always be checked on a ply level.

Sec.6
D 300   Matrix failure based on Puck's criterion

Sec.6 D
301
   Matrix cracking can be predicted using the criterion from Puck. It is probably the design criterion that describes the physics of the process the best.

Sec.6 D
302
   The criterion evaluates the stress state over all possible failure surfaces. The orientation of the failure surface is described by the angle q. The stress state sn, tnt, tnl in the co-ordinates of the failure surface described by q is obtained from the ply stresses by:

raster

raster

In addition, the stress component sII in fibre direction is needed.

sII = g f · g Sd · g M · Rd s1

Failure is evaluated based on the stress state sn, tnt, tnl for all angles q between - 90 and + 90 degrees. The design criterion is:

if sn (q) £ 0

raster

for all q with -90 £ q £ 90,

if sn (q) < 0

raster

for all q with -90 £ q £ 90,

where,
s1, s2, s3, s12, s13, s23
characteristic values of the local load effect of the structure (stress) in the co-ordinates of the ply.
gFpartial load effect factor (see 307)
gSd,partial load-model factor (from structural analysis see section 9)
gMpartial resistance factor (see 307)
gRdpartial resistance-model factor (see 308)
Fikstrength factors (see 303).


Sec.6 D
303
   The strength factors Fik are functions of the ply strength

 parameters raster matrix , raster matrix, raster shear, raster fibre , raster fibre , and shape parameters of the failure surface. The factors are defined as:
raster  , if raster and 
raster  , if raster  
raster  , raster  
raster  , raster  
raster  , raster  

with,

At = Ac = 1.6
raster  
raster  
raster  
raster  

where the shape parameters raster should be determined experimentally.
If they are not available the following default values shall be used:

raster

raster = raster matrix , raster raster matrix, raster raster shear.

Sec.6 D
304
   The characteristic strength for each of the stress

 components raster matrix , raster matrix, raster shear and the corresponding coefficients of variation COVn are defined as specified in section 4 A600. The combined COVcomb is defined as:

COVcomb = maxn (COVn )



Sec.6 D
305
   When two or more loads are combined, each stress component snk in direction n can be the result of several combined loads. In that case each stress component snkj, which is the local load effect of the structure in direction n due to load j, shall be considered separately as an individual stress component to determine the COV.

raster

or

COVcomb. = maxn (COVn )



Sec.6 D
306
   The choice of the partial safety factors shall be based on the most conservative partial safety factors obtained when treating each stress component snkj , which is the local load effect of the structure in direction n due to load j, as a single load.

Sec.6 D
307
   The partial safety factors gF and gM shall be chosen as described in section 8 with a COV equal to COVcomb , for both the characteristic strengths and the local load effects (see 304 to 306).

Sec.6 D
308
   The resistance model factor gRd shall be chosen to be 1.1. The model factor shall ensure a conservative result with respect to the simplifications made regarding the treatment of combined loads.

Sec.6 D
309
   Matrix failure cannot be checked on a laminate level, it shall always be checked on a ply level.

Sec.6
D 400   Obtaining orientation of the failure surface

Sec.6 D
401
   The orientation of the fibre failure surface is critical if a structure is loaded in compression. Matrix crack failure surfaces with an orientation of 30o to 60o relative to the plane of the laminate can reduce compressive fibre strength and reduce the resistance to delamination.

Sec.6 D
402
   The orientation of the failure surface should be determined with the Puck design criterion by finding the angle q at which the matrix design criterion in 302 reaches its maximum.

Sec.6 D
403
   If the laminate may have matrix cracks with an orientation of 30o to 60o relative to the plane of the laminate the compressive fibre strength shall be measured on laminates with the presence of such cracks and this value shall be used in the fibre design criterion (see this section under C). In this case the tested laminate should be equal to the one used in the component.

Sec.6
D 500   Matrix cracking caused only by shear

Sec.6 D
501
   Some laminates may fail (rupture) due to shear in the plies without fibre failure. This condition was described in C105. In this case matrix cracking due to stresses transverse to the fibres is acceptable. To check for this condition the matrix failure design criteria described in D100-D300 may be used by applying them just for shear stresses.

Sec.6 D
502
   For simple 2-D inplane conditions the matrix cracking design criterion in D200 reduces to:

raster

where,
s12characteristic value of the local load effect of the structure (stress) in the inplane shear direction 12
raster characteristic value of the stress components to matrix cracking in the inplane shear direction 12
gFpartial load effect factor
gSdpartial load-model factor
gMpartial resistance factor
gRdpartial resistance-model factor, gRd = 1.0

The co-ordinate system is the ply co-ordinate system.

Sec.6
D 600   Matrix failure checked by component testing

Sec.6 D
601
   Refer to section on component testing (section 10).
C: Fibre failure [Table of Contents] E: Delamination