The electronic pdf versions of the documents found through http://www.dnv.com/ are the officially binding versions. Copyright Det Norske Veritas.

[Book] [Expand] [Collapse] [Search Forms] [Previous Section with Hits] [Next Section with Hits] [Clear Search] [Help]

Expand Search


Sec.1: General [Table of Contents] App.A: Selection of Verification Level

DNV-OSS-304 Risk Based Verification of Offshore Structures

[-] Sec.2: Service Overview

SECTION 2
Service Overview

Sec.2
A. General

Sec.2
A 100   Objectives

Sec.2 A
101
   The objectives of this section are to describe the various verification activities for different phases of the life cycle of the structure.

Sec.2
B. Service Process

Sec.2
B 100   General principles

Sec.2 B
101
   The description of the process of DNV's verification of offshore structures is based on distinct project phases and the recognition of key milestones.

Sec.2 B
102
   Verification performed by DNV normally progresses through one or more of these project phases and may include all or selected aspects of the project.

Sec.2 B
103
   The risk based verification process described in relation to the normal project phases, is as follows:

Project initiation:
conceptual design.


 Project realisation:
detail design
construction
installation
as-built/as-installed documentation, including Design Fabrication and Installation (DFI) resume.


 Project operation:
operation manuals
operations, maintenance and repair.

Project abandonment:
decommissioning
removal.

Sec.2
C. Project Initiation

Sec.2
C 100   Verification of conceptual design

Sec.2 C
101
   Verification during the conceptual and/or feasibility studies of a project and in the early stages of a project can reduce cost for the design, fabrication as well as costs during the long term operation, inspection and maintenance phases. Verification during conceptual design will also reduce the need for verification during the design and construction phases.

Sec.2 C
102
   Structural verification of conceptual designs comprises:
review of conceptual drawings
review of conceptual design reports
review of project specifications
review of design procedures (Design Brief)
review of weight estimates
review of cost estimates.


Sec.2 C
103
   The structural verification of the conceptual design will be a function of the state of development of the concept. The expected level of development should be stated as part of the Asset Specification.

Verification work carried out during this phase may be used to define the verification plan for later phases as well as to give input to evaluations of suitable verification level low, medium or high for later phases.

Sec.2
D. Project Realization

Sec.2
D 100   General

Sec.2 D
101
   Verification during the Project realization phase is divided into design verification and construction phases. In general the verification will use the same split between design and construction as the project.

Sec.2 D
102
   The interface between design and construction phase should be accurately defined.

Sec.2
D 200   Verification of overall project management

Sec.2 D
201
   Verification of the overall project management is the examination of the means of controlling the entire process facility development project, or the phase for which verification is undertaken.

Sec.2 D
202
   This verification should confirm that the necessary controls are in place to ensure information flow across the various interfaces. It is especially important where separate contractors are employed for different phases of the project such as design and installation.

Sec.2 D
203
   Typically the documentation is expected to be in line with ISO 9000 requirements.

Sec.2 D
204
   Definition of scope of work for verification of overall project management shall follow Table D1.

Sec.2 D
Table D1 Scope of work for verification of overall project management  
 Level 
Verification activity 
Review of the project management process by    
review of project quality management documentation.
 
audit of project quality management system
 
 
review of sub-contractor control
 
 
review of interface controls
 
 
review of methods of information flow
 
  



Sec.2 D
205
   The verification of the overall project management quality system and documentation is optional. The reviews and audits should typically be performed if an extensive verification of a project is performed.

Sec.2
D 300   Verification during design

Sec.2 D
301
   Design verification is the examination of the assumptions, methods and results of the design process and is performed at the specified level of verification to ensure that the specified performance requirements of the object will be achieved.

Sec.2 D
302
   The verification is in general based upon the pre-requisite that the design is developed by an organisation having an implemented quality system. Confirmation of the designers QA system may be done as part of the verification of the overall management, by separate audits carried out as part of the structural verification, or by audits performed by the client or others.

Sec.2 D
303
   Design verification shall consist of one, or some, of the following:
audit of designers QA system
review of specifications for design
review of design premises or design briefs
review of drawings
review of design reports
performance of independent calculations
witness of model or laboratory test and
review of specifications for construction and operation resulting from design.


Sec.2 D
304
   Certain documents like design specifications may be subject to review that results in the issuance of specific comments while others like design reports are considered as background for the verification. Thus comments to design reports as such will in the general case not be given.

Sec.2 D
305
   The thoroughness that will be employed during verification of the structural design will be defined in the Verification Plan using the following three levels of scrutiny.
R1 Review of drawings and design principles
R2 Review of drawings and design principles and spot check of calculations
R3 Verification of structural integrity by performance of independent calculations.


Sec.2 D
306
   For Verification Level Low, scrutiny level R1 will be dominating with use of R2 and R3 for the elements with the highest risk. For Verification Level High, R3 will be the main method for verification. Medium Verification Level will use a balance of all three scrutiny levels.

Sec.2 D
307
    The selection of scrutiny level will in addition to the risk level also be made under consideration of the most suitable verification method in each case.

Sec.2 D
308
   Scope of work for verification of design for various levels of involvement is given in Table D2. Details of the scope need to be established in each case.

Sec.2 D
Table D2 Scope of work for verification of design  
Verification activity Level 
 L M H 
Designer's QA system     
audit of designer's QA system
 
Review of structural specifications for design by    
review of the design basis with emphasis on the design criteria
 
Review of design procedures by    
review of design brief
 
Review of drawings by    
review of drawings and main principles for the majority of the structure (scrutiny level R1) with review according to scrutiny level R2 and R3 only for the few elements with the highest risk
 
  
review of drawings and main design principles and spot check of design reports (scrutiny level R2) for the majority of the main structure, applying scrutiny level R1 for the least risk elements, and R3 for elements with the highest risk
 
  
review of drawings and main design principles and independent calculations (scrutiny level R3) for the majority of the main structure, applying scrutiny level R1 for the least risk elements and R2 for elements with moderate risk
 
  
Review of interfaces    
check designer system for interface control
 
 
independent check of the most important interfaces
 
  
Review of test    
review of model or structural test
 
 
witness of testing
 
  
Review of specifications for construction and operation by    
spot check of critical aspects
 
review of main specifications
 
 
thorough review of main specifications
 
  

Sec.2
D 400   Verification during fabrication

Sec.2 D
401
   Verification during fabrication is to ensure that the specified requirements of the structure will be achieved by carrying out various verification activities to sufficient detail.

Sec.2 D
402
   The verification is in general based upon the pre-requisite that the fabricator possesses an implemented quality system. Confirmation of the fabricators QA system may be done as part of the verification of the overall management, or by separate audits (e.g. MPQA) carried out as part of the fabrication verification or by audits performed by the client or others.

Sec.2 D
403
   Verification during fabrication shall consist of one, or some, of the following:
review of fabrication plans
review of quality plans
full time attendance of fabrication,
surveillance of fabrication processes
review of fabrication procedures
method and product quality assessment (MPQA)
failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA), inspection or spot checks audit of designers QA system
review of specifications for fabrication
review of interface controls
review of procedure for design changes
review of control of subcontractors
coordination of vendor inspections
vendor inspections
review of fabrication documents.


Sec.2 D
404
   The selected method for verification of different parts of the structure will be defined in the Verification Plan.

Sec.2 D
405
   The selection of scrutiny level will in addition to the risk level also be made under consideration of the most suitable method in each case.

Sec.2 D
406
   Scope of work for verification of fabrication for various levels of involvement is given in Table D3. Details of the scope need to be established in each case.

Sec.2 D
407
   Verification of these activities relates not only to the contractor's work but also to the monitoring of the work carried out by others.

Sec.2 D
408
   The following shall be used to describe the frequency if it is not specifically defined:
S1 Surveillance on a visit basis, e.g. once per week or sample review 10-20%
S2 Surveillance frequency at minimum once per day or review of 50-60%
S3 Surveillance frequency at minimum once per shift or review of 100% of items.


Sec.2 D
409
   Definition of scope of work for verification of fabrication should follow Table D3.

Sec.2 D
Table D3 Scope of work for verification of manufacturing and fabrication  
Verification activity Level 
 L M H 
Review of the manufacturing and fabrication process    
Review of :
Quality system organisation
Quality responsibilities and authority
Resources and personnel
Operational procedures and instructions
 
Audit of:
Human Resources
Capability review
Employee training
Internal and external support functions
Interface control
Design and development
Documentation and quality records
 
 
Review of manufacturing and fabrication procedures    
Review manufacturing, fabrication and inspection procedures for confirmation of compliance with the manufacturing specification
 
Review method statements
 
 
Review of qualification process    
Review of the Manufacturing Procedure Specification, (MPS), Manufacturing Procedure Qualification Test (MPQT), as applicable
 
Full time attendance during MPQT, as applicable, or first day production
 
 
Surveillance during manufacturing and fabrication activities    
Audit-based attendance during manufacturing and testing, to ensure, based on spot checks (level S1 in majority), that the delivered products are produced in accordance with the manufacturing specification with attendance according to level S2 and S3 only for the few elements with the highest risk
 
  
Audit-based and/or part-time attendance during manufacturing and testing to ensure, based on spot checks (level S2 in majority), that the delivered products are produced in accordance with the manufacturing specification with attendance according to level S1 for the least risk elements and S3 for elements with the highest risk
 
  
Full-time attendance during manufacturing and testing for the majority of the structure (level S3) level S1 for the least risk elements and S2 for elements with moderate risk
 
  
Review of final documentation    
Final documentation received for information   
Review of principles (R1)   
Review of principles and spot check of correctness (R2)   

Sec.2
E. Project Operation

Sec.2
E 100   Verification during operation

Sec.2 E
101
   Verification during operation shall be carried out by audit or spot check of the work in sufficient detail to ensure that the specified requirements of the structure continue to be achieved.

Sec.2 E
102
   Assessment of these activities will relate to the Owner's, as well as any contractor's, work.

Sec.2 E
103
   During operations, these assessments should consist of:
review of operations processes:
review of operations management systems
audit of the quality management system, if necessary
review of operations specifications and procedures:
confirmation of design assumptions
method statements
inspection plans
inspection methods
procedures for evaluation of inspection results
attendance during operations activities:
attendance during inspections
review of inspection records.


Sec.2 E
104
   In order to be able to carry out periodical surveys, the minimum documentation should include:
personnel responsible for the operation of the process facility
history of operation with reference to events that may have significance with respect to safety and functionality
installation condition data as required
inspection and maintenance philosophy, schedules and records
inspection procedures and results as appropriate.


Sec.2 E
105
   Definition of verification of the operations phase should follow Table E1.

Sec.2 E
Table E1 Scope of work for verification of operations 
 Level 
Verification activity L M H 
General review of the main document(s) to check compliance with applicable design documentation.
Audit during repair and modification. 
Audit attendance during start-up of periodical survey, modification and repair activities. For critical aspects, as identified by the requirement for maintenance of certificate, audit attendance throughout the activities. Review of contractors' documentation of the survey/modification.  
Review of the main document(s) to check compliance with applicable codes and standards. Audit attendance during start-up and performance of periodical survey, modification and repair activities. For critical aspects, as identified by the requirement for maintenance of certificate, full attendance throughout the preparations of and the activities. Issuing of independent confirmation documentation of the survey/modification.   



Sec.2 E
106
   Verification during operations is carried out to confirm that the structure continues to meet the Owner's specified requirements for integrity.

Sec.2 E
107
   Annual assessments may be carried out to confirm that any changes in the structural configurations (additional loads, damage etc.), are within acceptable limits and that the facility continues to be fit for the intended purpose.



Sec.2 E
108
   Additional assessments should be carried out to confirm that any damage, deterioration or modification to the structure systems do not render the facility unsuitable for the intended purpose.

Sec.2 E
109
   Verification of reassessments, design and fabrication of modifications or repair during the operational phase should be made according to D300 or D400.

Sec.2
F. Verification Documents

Sec.2
F 100   General

Sec.2 F
101
   The hierarchy of verification document is given in DNV-OSS-300 Appendix B. The descriptions of the content of these documents as well as examples of document forms are given in Appendix C to this specification.
Sec.1: General [Table of Contents] App.A: Selection of Verification Level